Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Brainspackle's commentslogin

huh?


You can easily use comments in the file for guidance, eliminating half your complaints


exe.dev has quickly become my platform of choice for hosting, testing, playing and tinkering. I haven't had this much fun playing with a providers offerings since VMs were a new thing. You have no idea what you're talking about here and should do a little research on them first. What you are saying they are, is not that.


Yes exe.dev is the first cloud provider I actually enjoy using. It's easy to manage with just ssh and they give me real disks. The lack of real (EBS is still networked) persistent disks on ec2 instances causes me a lot of pain at $WORK.


https://exe.dev/docs/shelley/llm-gateway

"The exe.dev LLM gateway provider source within an LLM integration remains supported. It provides exe.dev-managed access to Anthropic, OpenAI, and Fireworks models. Your subscription includes a monthly token allocation, and you can purchase additional tokens at https://exe.dev/user/shelley."

The access to closed platforms is managed according to the docs.


You don't need to use the LLM integration at all if you choose not to and even without it, it's a lovely service.

I've used the LLM only a few times to make a few sysadmin tasks easier that I could have easily done myself.


And? It's a convenience for their users (and most users for sure want this) for easy access to frontier closed and also open models (Fireworks). They advise also there is no markup or profit made for them in providing this managed gateway.

I guess I don't understand the OP's point even. Is there some conflict with providing this service and still being passionate about open source? IMV the answer is no.

Their main software product, Shelley, is open source: https://github.com/boldsoftware/shelley


Broken


how so?



Having to sign up to browse available MCPs stopped me dead in my tracks and made me close the tab. I won't be the only one. Perhaps consider allowing people to browse more of the site before you try to force a signup on them?


hey thanks for the feedback, we do not really offer a "set" of pre made MCPs that we could show pre signup, unfortunately our platform requires you to deploy something to use it - we try to give an overview of all the features in our "Platform" section in the navbar on top


ChatGPT 5.6 is out for some of us


i have access and i'm just a regular dude


Irregular company then?


i read this post while AI was busy managing jira tickets for me. Otherwise I wouldn't have had the time to be browsing HN right now


You should see what Cisco employees say about Webex!


what is a table-stake?


The minimum required payment to play a gambling game, where the money up for grabs is called "stake". See also "raising the stakes". In context it means the minimum feature set to be considered for adoption.


very nice response idle_zealot, it's this level of human decency in comments that keeps me coming back to HN


same — that was an unexpected little moment on HN. Honestly appreciated the answer as it caused me to stop and examine the phrase I've been using/hearing without never really thinking about it.


[flagged]


This is incendiary and unkind, violating the first rule about comments. Table-stakes is a perfectly reasonable expression.

Would you say that <word> is a way for Nigerians to sound smart?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: