ive got my own pwd file using a short shell script in bashrc that uses nano, gpg and /dev/shm to keep things in memory (hopefully). works great, is minimalist and there are no hidden surprises.
Tailwind's okay, it's just like going back to doing style="....." so it's ridiculously verbose but very simple. We stopped doing that a long time ago because having a 500-character string of inline styles sucks and you can see that all throughout the generated shadcn components, everything's got a small-to-medium wall of text of classes. But you probably don't need to look at those and only need to override a handful of specific classes in your own components or features.
This is "gotcha" style internet posting. It doesn't belong on HN.
To be specific, for clarity: "Most" is a dishonest word in this context, and regardless the parent did not imply a legal distinction. As for definition: First, nobody here is necessarily using the word by some specific definition invented at a particular time, but rather in the colloquial sense of being a member of a country. And regardless, even if we were restricting our sense of the word to the one you are referring to, recency does not imply some kind of triviality.
yeah, I started mostly with copy paste in the idea: duplicate this component and rename it to X because it largely did the same thing.
Eventually, I just use vscode to get a better picture, but i can get deer flow to pump out scaffolds, then tidy them up in open code.
It's about equal to what I can accomplish, but the current local LLMs when properly guided, do a lot better with complex dependency errors. So what I give up in my little programming bubble, I gain from not banging my head against some stupid 3rd party error or speghetti even driven madness.
They still don't get passed the level of complexity I know I can, but doing mostly greenfield or patches to open source, I spend a lot of time just restructuring.
With all that said, I'm probably in the same place as all the other AI users: not that much ROI in the bag.
SWIFT is headquartered in Belgium. Only 2 banks out of the total 24 on the board of directors is US banks. Unless there's a hostile takeover of the SWIFT organisation by the US, I think this is a bit of a stretch. (Plot-twist: Italy is on the board of directors.)
this article is a bit confusing because it talks about businesses outside of the EU. the PPWR affects businesses within the EU even more. businesses outside have a good chance to get away with ignoring the regulations because the EU will have a tough time to enforce them outside their borders. businesses in the EU however have no chance to escape.
and this isn't just tabletop games. this is any business shipping anything anywhere. the problem is that compliance costs several hundred dollars per country per year. that means unless you make thousands of dollars in profits in any single country, you can't afford shipping to that country any more.
> Although generally safe these reactors aren't totally safe.
I have some seriously bad news about the safety of your totally-safe house against meteorites. Or for that matter, thermonuclear explosives detonated directly above its roof.
At this point, it seems pretty obvious to me that every group in this conflict is willing to do basically whatever it takes to push through what it wants. Both sides do it so clumsily and stupidly that they only end up pissing off both observers and their opponents even more. Consensus can never really be reached, because the whole point of these theatrics is the fight itself.
I’m not American, so I’m not used to this kind of thing at all, which makes it even stranger for me to watch one group roleplaying as deeply religious while at the same time embodying arrogance, greed, and a lust for power, while on the other side you have people fighting for equality so hard that it eventually turns into plain old racism, sexism, and mental gymnastics, with definitions of words and concepts being constantly changed just to make them fit into an already flimsy theory meant to explain why the patriarchy or some similar nonsense is supposedly to blame for everything.
I’m genuinely curious to see how the conflict between these two groups develops from here. It just keeps getting more and more absurd.
For whatever it's worth, the new W10/11 designs aren't in line with traditional Mac design philosophies either. They're more in line with those of iOS and Android with how they tend to bury and omit options entirely and prefer massive whitespace.
GP already explicitly called it bipartisan, and it was bipartisan well before Obama (though if we're pointing fingers at a modern president for accelerating the abuse of "national security", it really should be Dubya).
Not sure if this is meant to be practical, but I think this would work better if the upcoming turn was centered in the view once it’s within a certain range, as a kind of anticipation. This helps prepare for the jarring shift in perspective and, in case there’s multiple turns in short succession (as there might be when exiting a highway, for instance), gives you a visual heads-up about what’s next.
That's fascinating! If any of your work using AI to identify reproductions is publicly sharable, I'd love to learn more about it (amateur antique collector here). But if not I understand.
Impeachment that has to be done in a house of congress that was designed to have minimal accountability and is deeply anti-democratic? Maybe it "broke" down because there were no real checks and balances to begin with.
The candycodes mentioned at the end of the article are absolutely brilliant as well. These products have extremely intimate relations with bodies and protecting that chain can avoid a lot of harm.
It's perfectly possible to design a GUI without button controls, where literally all the interaction is done with keyboard inputs. It's still not a TUI: it has graphical visual layout, and the UI signaling is out of band with respect to the data it's presenting.
We are so far away from that even being a possibility.
We live in a world that is most corrupt, at the very top. Why would anyone trust that world? Trust is required for this technology to be willingly adopted.
The tech oligarchs and their boosters are doing more to radicalize the US populace than Bernie or AOC ever could.
The mask has been slipping for a while, but a combination of Trump getting elected and AI psychosis has lead to a lot of premature celebration over their belief in being the new masters of the permanent underclass. Now the the mask is completely off and revealed them for the disgusting reptiles they have always been.
