Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Cockbrand's commentslogin

The Finder has an interesting take on this: copy a file with ⌘C, then move it somewhere with ⌥⌘V. This is much nicer than the Windows Explorer's CTRL+X and CTRL+V, where the user is unsure what happens when they never paste the file.

What does happen if you never paste the file?

It feels to me like cut/copy (in the clipboard manipulation sense)/paste are nonsensical operations on files in the first place.


Nothing.

So the "cut" file just disappears then? Is there an "undo?" That seems really horrifying.

No. The file disappearing is something. If you cut, and don't paste, nothing happens. And there is nothing to undo.

So the "cut" file doesn't disappear from its directory when you "cut" it? Only when it's pasted?

Yes. That is what happens.

The Mac now has a clipboard history as well, it's just a bit awkward. You can open Spotlight with ⌘Space, and within Spotlight open the clipboard manager with ⌘4.

I used to use a 3rd party clipboard (until blocked by work) that used Cmd-Shift-V to bring up the clipboard. So much nicer than Apple's solution.

Ya that’s too awkward. Clipboard history needs to be ⌘+Shift+V or I’d never use it

I remember that there had been a discussion about providing free Interrail tickets to all EU citizens at some age (18 or 19 maybe?), which I found a brilliant idea. I don't know whether this actually ever materialized, though.



This is how I learned cursive in school, and it never occurred to me that this may interrupt my writing flow. I agree that doing the backtracks after writing the entire word would add to my mental load, but that's probably because I'm not used to that.

So generally, I'd say that the mental load is basically a matter of how one learned cursive in the first place. Though I agree that the mostly backtrack-free Cyrillic cursive looks more elegant.

Would be interesting to learn about the perspective of people who learned Chinese or Japanese as their first script.


Cursive isn't seen as being fancier than the reference form of a character in China. It's something you do to make writing easier.

I've gotten comments about how neat my Chinese writing is from people surprised that I don't use handwriting. There's a simple reason for that: I've never learned how to do Chinese handwriting.


Similarly, why don't photos get auto-straightened, maybe with an option to revert to original? I spend too much time aligning the horizon properly on snapshots that I took while cycling. The phone even has the data from the rotation sensor, so this should be fairly easy to implement.


A different UX issue I have with these buttons is that the designers seen to have chosen the wrong rotation direction.

I almost always need to rotate photos 90⁰ to the right, so I have to tap that button three times. Apart from that, if I have only one way to rotate my photo, clockwise seems more intuitive to me anyway.


Or another bug seen in the wild: the image rotates opposite to the button’s icon label.


I was too, and I was going to ask whether this is a good use of taxpayer money, as the ICANN fee for registering a TLD is $227,000. But given the fact that the Web was invented at CERN, I could imagine that they got a special deal.

Happy to learn about details if someone knows more!


As an aside, Rogue Amoeba are one of an ecosystem of great and greatly passionate indie software houses for the Mac.

All of them create excellent software with polished UIs, provide excellent support and never forget to have fun. This seems to be unique to the Mac, at least at this scale.


Gotta love how some of the spectators on the larger Joseph Heintz the Younger painting enjoy the entertainment. Too bad that these images predate the invention of popcorn!


> predate the invention of popcorn

Popcorn's been around for thousands of years.


Let me correct myself:

Too bad that these images predate the wide availability of popcorn in the old world and its common usage as a snack eaten during entertainment.


A bit unclear - it says

> Weller’s largest study yet is due to be published later in 2019

But in the header, it also says

> Updated May 31, 2024

I'd still love to know whether there has been further research in the meantime.


And https://web.archive.org/web/20260000000000*/https://www.outs... seems to suggest 2021. I guess we'll put that above, although we had 2019 in the 2022 thread (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48715020) :)


It was published early 2019, maybe late 2018.

Searching for the title of the article ("Is sunscreen the new margarine?") makes it easy to pinpoint: there is a open letter responding to the article, dated January 15, 2019. https://www.asds.net/Portals/0/PDF/LetterToTheEditor-Outside...


Ok, let's go with 2019!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: