actually yes. Google has better mechanism of finding the products I am looking for. Some would say this is serene acceptance (fifth stage of grief). Also when tuning my browser too much towards the privacy, I kept getting mugged by "please show all the bicycles on the picture" for too many times, so I acknowledge I will be shoved up in my a...throat with new models of the washing machine I've just bought, and the sexy lingerie for some reason, that I'm not really sure of.
I just want to point out that it was the company's legal counsel I believe. Hence the "right thing" was only the right thing for the company. Not necessary for the greater good or their conscience.
> It is in the nature of their business to keep the market under-supplied
What?! If they did an anti competitive agreement sure. Otherwise no as each supplier is incentivized to produce more than its competitor and less than the demand, while divesting just enough to survive the oversupply risk.
Well. If you were a for profit company and were offered to get the most effective ads ever at the cost of 0.1% of advertisement containing falsehoods about your product, would you take it?
What about if you know your competitors are taking the offer?
I don't think facebook is viable counting only usage. It's only viable because having a Facebook account means you have Meta apps, so you can be tracked and your behavior and opinions sold. Regardless of how often you open the app.
reply