This sounds like one agent at each junction point, that may or may not be running the same model and architecture as the previous one, and they need to constantly crawl each other or just a protocol to call each other. But then you have a million of then constructing a docuverse web all having an agent who all need to know each other and its all connections and each a database repository.

Well you only need links that exist, and those that are created.

In a paragraph it may exist in one node that is referenced and that node may be a collection of other nodes, or each sentence or even each word points to other nodes, how much does each model know and what does it keep in its database. A point to the next node is not necessarily durable or versioned, and that goes for each node is connects to.

A single paragraph could have thousands or more sources, references, and each source would need versioning and depending on version it may well point to different nodes in prior or future versions.

A proper version of a paragraph would then need to know this, or expect that all nodes with an agent will be durable and rational and interoperable but if you build on that premise it will not work in the real world.

All unless you keep the docuverse limited in scope to a few data stores and agents who comprehend that spatial universe, and it is a form of an intranet

This is all made possible by broker app on the iPhone / (or other device) to send data back and forward. When I first read the headline I thought it would integrate directly into the Apple ecosystem without needing middlemen which would have been crazy impressive since I believe it is or very near entirely impossible.

not impossible, pypush did it 3 years ago

Every device requires a random product key issued by apple and they’re not supposed to be reused.

No good way to get around that except buying an Apple device and taking its key.

Well from his product page for exe.dev and the devtools he mentions

- GitHub closed source - AWS closed source - GCP closed source . Slack closed source - ChatGPT closed source . Claud closed source - though mention only in passing Google Docs is also closed source

Then they hawk a product they are selling: Cloud Pool plan

If you limit the argument to just be the exact thing you have running on your desktop then I think the definition is so narrow its nearly useless.

Your rent payments now, may be quite different in a few months. If you rent an apartment in a desirable location, which is far easier than owning a house in a desirable location, then rent payments are huge.

And comparable or worse than owning a house in farther out.

Your luck with landlords can wary a lot, and your rent payments may increase substantially with little notice. The landlord may also sell the building with either different management or repurpose it for something else and you will have to find a different apartment.

You may also suddenly have unpleasant neighbors. That is true with a house as well, but the distance between you and them is closer in an apartment.

As a dog lover, If you wish to have a big dog your may not be allowed to. If you want a yard to kids to play, you cant. If you want chickens you cant. (I know many in Denver who do) If you wish to install extra cooling /AC/heatpump you probably cant.

None of that negates your arguments fully, but the case is far from as black and white as you make it.

> You may also suddenly have unpleasant neighbors. That is true with a house as well, but the distance between you and them is closer in an apartment.

Not all, but a lot of the debate between renting and owning include something like this, but you can rent a home, and you can buy an apartment.

very weird how so many people are using apartments vs single family homes as a variable in discussing renting vs buying

I think it's because there's only a tenuous sense of control with things in-between, and to some extent SFHs that have strict HOAs. I mentioned in another comment that although in theory (in the US & Canada anyway) you can buy an apartment or duplex or townhouse, but as far as I'm aware you only gain marginal control over what you can do to modify it if you wanted to, and the advantage to owning largely comes down to owing the bank vs owing a landlord, but otherwise (sometimes even with SFHs without HOAs) you are beholden to the local bureaucracy if you want to make any significant changes condo strata and/or city permits). Seems like buying a non-SFH for any significant amount more than renting the same place is just trading the fear of eviction for the burden of debt, and buying a SFH is just debt+burden but you get a garden or something.

It's not weird, since 99% of rentals are apartments, right?

Source? In my neighborhood on the outskirts of downtown (about a 10 minute drive out) at least 25% of the houses are rentals, maybe more like 33%. Lots of investment properties people scooped up when mortgages were 2%.

It is depressing how little has changed.

SO this is what pretty much all media does these days right?

Post an article on the newspaper, substack, wherever and then a a link to it on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Blue and wherever else.

The question I why did you edit photos? What was goal? Why were you doing it in the first place?

I guess the thing you have discovered shooting analog is that each click is a finite resource so you spend more time composing and being aware of the scene before you take the photo.

Saving £20 is nice.

Having your 36 snapshots developed at a decent lab will cost you more.

In you are paying them additionally for edits as well you are on longer saving money. You just pay someone else.

Or are you giving it to a company that runs it through an automated usually digital these days sometimes analog machine that develops them automatically? Those machines usually do edits as well. But highly automated ones. (I am not sure they make them anymore)

Having my medium format film developed is far from cheap.

Lightroom is far from the only editor out there and it is not a great editor to start with. Lightroom is a Frankenstein combination of of a DAM and an editor.

You probably will want some form of DAM to organize your photos regardless.

I have been awake too long so I am probably stupid. Please have mercy.

I don't understand. NASA says they goal of landing on the moon in 2028 is not realistic.

They are adding a launch in 2027 to do more testing.

Great.

It will be followed by one possibly two lunar landings in 2028. Are the now 2028 landings primarily testing SpaceX integration?

The Artemis rockets are huge, and extremely expensive. And the build time is considerable.

Now they are planning 3 rockets in two years, each of which is not reusable?

Then they have to build those in parallel, which makes sense but incorporating wha you learn in 2027, into rockets you have already nearly finished seems an odd approach

Is the software good at what it does? Does it give a good return on investment?

That seems like a question worth knowing the answer to.

A second good question is what are the available competitors?

If the NCY Public Hospitals drop Palantir today, What systems will give them the same functionality at a comparable, (hopefully cheaper) price?

You cannot.

iOS is one problem, but it goes for every other device/server/desktop/appliance that you use.

You can take a lot of precautions, and mitigate some risk, and ensure that operations can continue even if something bad happens¹, but you cant ever "be safe".

¹ "" There are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don't know we don't know "" (Often attributed to Donald Rumsfeld, though he did not originate the concept.)

Know what bad can happen is difficult.

Except Qubes OS, which often saves you even when an unknown unknown happens.