There should be according to their faq https://uruky.com/faq

We didn't have known datacenters bombed till now

I mean yes, Amazon servers in the middle east aren't doing great, but I guess it's not what you're talking about

It was included in what I was talking about. Why would you publicise something that just paints a big target.

getting a road bike is understated, at least where i live it is so nice to roam around outisde cities with just a few cars around

There is also the Italian one, AFAIK you can use this as an official tool to check whether your speed is at least the minimum speed that should be provided by contract.

I don't know whether it pings to italy even outside italy/eu

https://misurainternet.it/misura-speedtest/?speedtest=inizia

Given oop info I can found online, they built it to advertise themselves, I think show hn would have been much more appropriate

Mac in requirements is wild tho

If it was windows or Linux only I feel like no one would bat an eye. Plenty of software is OS dependent. Am I missing something?

I do think they should’ve put that in the title, however. Save a lot of people time

I agree with you for the no one would bat an eye had it been windows or linux

I do find the project cool, just a bit too sensationalized given the title

At this point we should have had Ai induced apocalypse a few times according to him

I haven't read from him in a while, but I don't think there was a single dated prediction that supports your argument. Do you have any sources for this claim?

I haven't read from him in a while either - but I remember reading enough tweets from him about being confident at x% probability we'll die before year z due to an Ai doing the funny

The crackhead also doesn't make dated predictions, yet I don't see people holding him up as a great modern thinker and predictor of the future.

So, if we disagree with someone's reasoning, the proper reaction is to make up random unsubstantiated claims about them and compare them to drug addicts?

I don't think this matches the guidelines of this website.

People are complaining about products engineered to be as addictive as possible, we're talking about something more than simple self control

everybody has a choice to just uninstall apps, leave the phone at home, switch it off at 8pm etc. that's what it means to be an adult. some people get addicted to work or sports - people even died from it - should we ban that, too?

The article is discussing regulating the algorithms, not banning the social networks. Just like cigarettes and alcohol are regulated but not banned

It has that ai je ne sais quoi

You could have used show hn since you made it

I would say that they are the first that decide to make everyone's life harder on purpose, first. Trying to pay them back is the least somebody could do