Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | brodo's commentslogin

> Wait, so Europeans dont want to use github pages?

Yes

> And would rather pay 9 euros/month?

No


Overall a great point, but I have a nit-pick:

> Modern art, as everyone should know, started in 1860s in Europe

As someone who is active in the German art scene, the understanding is not that clear-cut. Modern art, as I learned it, is "art in the modern period". So everything after the middle ages. Basically when people stopped only drawing religious art and portraits of nobles. What started in the 1860s is "modernism".

The term used more often (at least in Germany) is "contemporary art". Which translates to "everything after WW 2". I've seen a lot of contemporary art museums, but few modern art museums.


The 1860s as a starting decade is a popular conventional definition in English, in other languages "modern art" may be defined differently. But you are absolutely right, it makes more sense to call post-WW2 art the contemporary art or just postmodernism, because something that happened long before the birth of the half of the population of the planet isn't really "contemporary".


I think this may be a translation issue, as I would always have understood "modern art" to refer to the movement that began in the 1860s, and (English) Wikipedia appears to back this up. Like others have said, "contemporary art" means art of the current time.

> I've seen a lot of contemporary art museums, but few modern art museums.

My experience is the opposite, I have seen plenty of modern art museums, most famously (probably) the Museum of Modern Art in New York. Some modern art museums also feature contemporary art but nevertheless their main focus and brand is modern art (eg, the Tate Modern).


No, Modern or Modernist art (with a capital m) is a specific period of art history. So yes it doesn’t tend to have museums but there are shows dedicated to Modern art.

Contemporary art always refers to art from the specific period the speaker is living in, ie our present moment.


>Basically when people stopped only drawing religious art and portraits of nobles.

We drew vastly more art. The kind you describe was just more likely to be preserved as the institutions they were on about and the buildings they resided in persisted.


Based on historical books, funny drawings on toiletes (like boxes they used as toilets and then fertilizer) were super popular.

We dont show them in museums tho.


Surely people created a lot more art, but you're eliding the dynamic of professionalism. Art is ludicrously labor-intensive and so the vast majority of professional art (i.e. most art worth saving) would have been done for rich people.


I am indeed eliding the dynamic of professionalism. I don't think it has to be "ludicrously" labour intensive and I think "professional art" is overvalued and an absolute minority of all art ever created.

It just so happens that a lot of the modern/contemporary art talked about is mostly the domain of professional art (and examples that say otherwise are often not even thought of as such like hippy tie dye clothing.)


> So everything after the middle ages. Basically when people stopped only drawing religious art and portraits of nobles. What started in the 1860s is "modernism".

Ok, but you are reinforcing parent's point (which I agree with TBH).


Yes, I agree with the parent's point. I just wanted to point out that "modern art" is a little bit of a complicated term.


What kind of art do you think the MoMA (Museum of Modern Art), houses?


I've never been there, but the German Wikipedia says it houses "modern and contemporary art". I'd assume that in their vast collection, you might even find stuff that's older than the 1860s.


The oldest works there are from the 1880s.


- contemporary art -

Now I have to nitpick, too too :-)

According to my understanding on the usage of "contemporary art", this is a "time relative term", meaning it describes usually "what was usually/common around a given time/period"?


I'm just patiently waiting for Bun to lose momentum and for Node to pick up the best ideas from Bun. Takes a couple of years usually, but saves me two migrations.


There are a lot of Claudisms[1] in there for sure.

1:https://claudisms.ai


I would make the larger point that I do not like my software to depend on any software with a bus factor of one that I can't control. Elm had this problem and Acadia has it too.


The bus factor for Elm is currently 2, since Tereza (his Wife) works on both Elm and Acadia.


Unless they make a point to always travel separately, this seems more like a variable bus factor between 1 and 2, just as the Presidency of the United States has a much lower bus factor during the State of the Union address.


I think other nations are not asking themselves which country has the best human rights record. That time has passed. Trump and Putin have pushed the world back to pure power politics. All the middle powers want to be less open to US blackmailing by diversifying. They know China is not their friend, but the US isn't either, and China is more predictable.


It works well in Germany. For products too, at least what I tried. The last time I did a very German product search (association-management software) the first hit was a comparison on golem.de, which is pretty solid.


It’s enough to add a `?` to any Kagi query to get an AI answer. I like that I can choose for which queries I use AI and for which traditional web search.


Yea, usually the next step is starting a Kickstarter campaign and then rug-pulling.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVsqIjAeeXw


Wrapping this [1] in a skill will help a lot: Also add this [2] and `zig fmt` to your buid.zig.

[1]: https://github.com/rockorager/zigdoc [2]: https://github.com/rockorager/ziglint


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: