Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | duxup's commentslogin

I find people in person are pretty welcoming of nuanced opinions.

Online if people even smell something they don’t like… it goes bad fast.


I certainly can’t tell.

I honestly think I’d need weeks of all workday testing to even form an opinion… and some in depth training before that to use each given tool right…

And then … I might decide I can’t tell the difference.

As it is I use Claude and I don’t have the time to properly compare.


I don’t know what is going to happen economically but I did search this morning to investigate some beeping from my garage door opener.

Every page was the same AI garbage that provided lots of wordy paragraphs … no real information.

Sad state.


That’s an interesting contrast to what I perceive as an issue where I am.

Where are my kids go to school there’s plenty of classes for gifted kids (as in kids who excel in a traditional school environment). And there’s plenty of help for kids with challenges.

But it feels like there’s really nothing to try to move the needle for anyone else, anyone not super motivated or with specific challenges.

If you doing “ok” nobody cares.


> It’s totally 100% the intent of the interviewer.

If the interviewer did in fact share their personal trauma story as the author says then it would seem to indicate that was what they were asking for.

I know of places where that kind of sharing was the norm.



It’s the best of the options that I’ve tried. So I guess I like it.

There was an amusing post about judging developers based on token usage where some user on HN here was pushing this idea “ICs don’t like it but this is the best way to evaluate” (something like that).

They have a whole management team and can’t seem to find a way to judge or god forbid encourage developers…


I don't get why it's so hard for management to see the good devs. All the devs know who are the good devs.

And they know things like “Dude isn’t a high performer metrics wise but his work is solid.” Arguably some of the most difficult things to know from a management perspective.

Problem is in management, management usually comes up non-sense metric when they themselves lack of good metric.

For example, everyone talks about strategy, but when you ask them what's our strategy answer is usually something like:

* let's figure out together

* industry changing is so fast, we should revisit plans every quarter

...


Because the higher up you go in management, the more "strategy" is a Plato's Cave like interpretation of what better/bigger/whatever competitors are doing.

Ha. Exactly at my current contract job.

"Welcome to the new contractor who will be the artitect our new infrastructure. What is your dream IT setup?"

"Yeah, we can't afford that. Lets revisit once you wrangle those 2003 Dell R620's running Windows 2008 with no patching."

And that is why after eight months i'm terminating my contract on Friday and swimming back to shore.


“It’s ok if our guy does it.”

-SCOTUS majority



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: