Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | free_bip's commentslogin

Unfortunately, no pricing or technical information has been released yet.

They can easily add this "individuality" in RLHF. The base model won't know, correct, but the final user-facing model very much can if that's what they so desire.

IMO the big news here is that they created effectively a drop-in replacement for the Leela Chess Zero model - which ended up outperforming the best existing LC0 model. Could make LC0 more competitive long term vs. stockfish if they choose to adopt the chessformer architecture.

I think they would most likely end up calling 911. I hope that Waymos only drive in locations with cellphone signal.

That's not what the previous comment is referring to. They're referring to false positives, i.e "Gemini did not generate this (or process it) yet it says SynthID confirmed"

So imagine the damage you could do to an artist by having Gemini flag it then saying “see here’s the proof they’re using AI art!” That person would get eaten alive.

...except they can produce the same image without the fake SynthID.

They must have used the tool from TFA!

Those are not the same as prediction markets

So it'll still raise at least 300 million? Sounds like a great thing to me. I dunno why you think it doesn't matter.


Unlocking extra housing is the real boon, the tax revenue is the bonus.


It makes more sense when you realize the whole point is to distract from the continued failure to release the Epstein files.


or distact from the Iran war, or distract from Israel, or distract from corruption... distraction from distractions. We keep buying what they're selling, and then complain the milk is still sour.


Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.


Easy with the use of "we" there buddy. Just look at the polling. There are way more people not buying the bullshit, and the numbers keep getting worse as even the faithful are tiring of it as well. So just tossing "we" around becomes offensive as you've now included me into something I will not be a part of.


The numbers have sort of plateaued. There's a ~30% of the population that is all-in on Trump for emotional/psychological reasons, who have very different values from the rest of the population. Where others see malicious incompetence, they see him sticking it to their opponents and are even willing to suffer as long as they perceive their opponents to be suffering more. So although they don't like paying a lot of extra money for gas, they will put up with it for a long time because the payoff is seeing others suffer more. IT's not that Trump created this mindset, although he was able to capitalize on it due to being celebrity; about 1/3 of people are assholes and they're able to use the internet to network and coordinate like any other group. Unfortuantely, they are one of the largest social groups, while opponents have to deal with the friction of coalition politics.


That's fine, but at 30% "we" is doing a lot of heavy lifting. If it was 80% in favor, then maybe "we" could be accepted. Even at the less than a majority winning the election makes "we" difficult to accept.


Too little too late, unfortunately. The train has left the station.


"We" really don't. The captured media do.

A lot of people still look to the MSM to define reality for them.

But there's a huge and myserious disconnect between the MSM's reporting of Trump as a Serious Person, and the reality that he's a compulsive liar and fantasist and is seriously ill with advancing dementia.

Without honest reporting, "we" don't have a public voice.


Oh please, the government could easily force them to hand over their research. This is not a serious argument.


Would it be really so straightforward for the government to do that?


i doubt they don't have access already


Plenty of people doubt evolution.

Doubt without evidence is just noise.


You're already watched by security cameras, it's not hard to do facial recognition anymore. And you have companies literally lining up to sell such facial recognition databases. It's conceivable they could determine what price you pay for groceries while your car is on the way to the store, thanks to Flock.


Disney Parks patented tracking via shoes and groups of people/families based on scanning their shoes upon park entry to build an index of guests. Not sure how and where it was all applied during park visits for guests but you're definitely correct that facial recognition upon store entry to kickoff a live dynamic profiling of a customer is what's currently being beta tested/deployed by some retailers.


Why would they need to do that when you are already wearing an RFID bracelet?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: