i guess this fits: https://thealliance.ai/projects/tapestry

ssshhhh don't tell anybody it's still working, i have some stuff to do :-)

one more reason for Europe to (try to) move away from US companies.

Although it's gonna be more difficult to come up with a Fable competitor than a m365 one

They're good at marketing, but my first subjective assessment of Fable is that it's really smart.

I've been working with gpt 5.5 and opus 4.8 quite a lot, and interacting with Fable feels like a smart guy just entered the room.

Yeah idk what people are talking about- it's not marketing. This thing is substantially better than opus 4.8/gpt5.5 from what I'm seeing today.

it's obviously a satire and that makes me feel bad because some components are actually cool and i'd like to use them ...

i'll tell you if it ever happens

this feels more like a PR statement than a description of how you used the tool though

i've experimented quite a lot with multi agent setups and orchestrations.

In the end, it didn't feel worth it mostly because of high token overhead (inter agent communications, agents re reading same code, etc...) and synchronization / cooperation issues (who should do what).

What actually works for me and provides good results: multi step workflows with clearly defined steps and strong guidance for the agent.

you should check with people working on Claude Code, cache has been udpated to 5min ... https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/46829#issue...

So yeah, 1M window that expires every 5min .... not good