Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jeffwask's commentslogin

LOL, reminds me of when we had bonuses tied to test coverage at a company and one enterprising dev wrote a single test that flagged as 100% coverage.

The thing that struck me most was that for 25 of 27 years, they have relied entirely on machines and computers to manage the condition which means every hard-earned lesson you have experienced they did not and the author likely has very little person knowledge and experience on how to do anything off the pump.

It's the AI argument in a nutshell. We are handing things off to machines and losing the knowledge to do it ourselves.

Imagine if this were a systemic catastrophic failure, that lasted months... how many people would perish just because they weren't taught or never learned how to manage without the machine.


The Mad Men AI upscale was such trash. You could see cameras, crew, equipment, etc. total mess that showed no care for the material.

Wasn't this a remaster, not an ai upscale? And I thought that the incomplete effect situation has been resolved.

Wait, they used raw-unedited video as a source? Are they mad! (Pun intended)

Go fast; Break things

I think I've lived through three separate RAM boom cycles at this point. Two for sure...

They were a fairly common occurrence in the late 90s. I worked at an OEM at the time and we would stockpile it during gluts for that reason, then make a killing ~6-9 months later.

What should we be doing now if we want to profit?

Ez, buy low sell high and don't buy high and sell low

Buy what, exactly? GPUs? Are they "low" right now?

My guess is that motherboards, cases and PSUs will be low soon.

They only dominate Ads because they dominate search if everyone leaves Search the ad business grinds to a halt as well. These are the ying and yang of Google.

Kind of. They dominate ads because the dominated search when they bought the successful ads company. By that point in time, they already had your profile built, and the further use of search just continues to enhance that profile. But now that ads has its own persistent tracking that dependence on search is not as strong as it used to be

People have reported a decrease in ROI from spending on Google ads already when they no longer control all the eyes and where you rank in what those eyes see when they search, that ROI will drop even more. People will stop paying for Google ads when the ROI is higher on other platforms.

Couple that with the fact that a lot of folks have moved their search to GPT or Claude once those platforms start taking in ad money... that budget will come from somewhere and that's likely existing Google ad buy dollars shifting.


> when they bought the successful ads company

Could you elaborate on this? What ad company did Google buy?


DoubleClick (2008, according to Wikipedia)

doubleclick.net, about 20 years ago.

> it's not Google Search

...and it really hasn't been for a good number of years now. I left a while ago when results were all SEO copy pasta blogs this is just a final nail in the coffin.


These articles always make me think of the South Park BP Oil episode. "We're sorry. So sorry..."

For easy access: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PU4gBzEnQ6M

Statements like that one deserve all the ridicule we can pile upon them.


we must be the same age or have the same sense of humor. This is what my mind went to immediately.

My first tech job coincided with the first season of South Park.

I am truly, deeply sorry for revealing my true feelings on how much I value some of the employees that helped me become utterly, filthy rich. It will not happen again.

We had one do this in San Antonio too. Right across the well labeled low water crossing and whoosh.

Woz is one of the good one.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: