Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more patrickk's commentslogin

Those whole article is very interesting, but it’s AI-slop writing. It’s very off putting, like reading LinkedIn self promoting wankery.


On slide 6, they list the Mag7 stocks (not defined in a foreword), but on slide 8 they list the free cash flow (FCF) of a somewhat different set of companies. Why not stick to the Mag7 FCF only? It muddies the waters.


Apple is not burning its cash on buildout, which would make their graph less interesting.


True. This slide also struck me the most, but for the data it shows. Free cash flow for all the hyperscalers basically evaporated in the last couple of months, with Oracle in the minus. What does this mean?


the FCF slide is for hyperscalers - which excludes TSLA, NVDA


Yes but the Mag 7 is the main focus, suddenly switching to a different set of companies is comparing apples to oranges. That slide belongs in an annex.


That slide should probably be the main focus, with the rest supplementary.

That is the slide that is likely to pop the economy.


I was here when you called it!

Is that Oracle down there increasingly in the negative? & Amazon's free cash flow reaching zero?


How so? An economy is all about cash flow, and this is cash flow.



I originally read it as EVIL/UPDATE.

Anyway, Meta, really? Just to have more of our data? For the absolutely pedestrian explicit purpose of providing more information to advertisers?

This is why I don't buy into conspiracy theories. The truth is typically really boring and predictable - evil corporations will evily corporate.

I half wish for a more exciting villain that would give people a noticeable reason to stand up against - not just annoying people with intrusive ads.


Meta can figure out the information about users that helps it target ads. That’s one of their moats.

Giving advertisers demographic information outright would actually weaken Meta’s moat.


Brand value of the ‘prestigious’ law firms will still count for something in the minds of C suite executives (who of course will ensure they themselves are not trampled on by AI). The same dynamic will likely happen with high-powered consulting, big 4 audit/accounting firms and so on, even if inside those companies it’s just a shell of its former self.



Shell companies for the ruling class, ever decreasing anonymity for the peasants.


He tried to back out of the purchase after signing an agreement, but was forced to buy it for $44b in the end.


For those who wish to do OCR on photos, like receipts, or PDFs or anything really, Paperless-NGX works amazingly well and runs on a potato.


In parallel, local models are getting better and better, so eventually they’ll get “good enough” to run fairly cheaply at a level close to the current Sonnet/Opus models (what I run Claudeclaw with), on Groq, Openrouter or whatever commodity provider. Perhaps even mid to high end consumer PCs when the current RAM madness subsides.

There’s loads of good discussions about local LLMs in this thread:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47190997


In a similar boat. I’m running “ClaudClaw” a clone of Openclaw to enforce discipline in my limited free time to get an AI agency off the ground, in order to try to escape the miserable corporate grind. On the one hand, it’s a massive productivity boost, on the other hand, this tech is going to further hollow out the middle class everywhere and make so many people redundant. I don’t have the luxury to simply quit and focus on it full time.


Leaving your job has a different sense of finality now. When time comes to look for a new job, will the job even exist anymore? Makes the risk calculus a bit different. Maybe there won't be mass unemployment, but even a modest increase in SWE unemployment could make it so much harder and more stressful to find a job.


We’re already seeing the impact of AI in the jobs market for junior devs, and in marketing and more. So there’s unquestionably going to be a rough adjustment period. My thought on it is to build something concrete that I own, and take advantage of the disruption of possible, instead of being crushed by it.


I could be wrong but I feel like there are more opportunities in marketing now with seo being polluted by ai. Paying for ads seems more necessary.


I’m seeing loads of posts in the likes of /r/n8n where people are figuring out how to do the jobs of multiple people with just one person, using workflows built and enhanced by AI. Copywriting, cross posting on social media, blogging, cold email outreach, fully automated user generated video content, running Facebook and Insta ad campaigns, google ad campaigns and more. All this can can be done once you nail down a solid workflow, powered by the likes of n8n, Claude code etc.


How are you using it to enforce discipline? And whats the business case for the AI agency? Helping other businesses adopt or something like that?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: