> For example I have decades of Software experience, but wont know where to even begin what OP did.

Simple, you start by asking LLM for more info.

It isnt programmers fault though.

> mistakes as the programmers: taking 'rules' literally

Isnt it how we make stable, deterministic and predictable system? How do you want to create one with ambiguous rules?

Software engineering is a domain on its own, just a technical, not a business one. Good luck with looking for a once in a million data race or deadlock bugs. Good luck with synchronizing system distributed over a whole globe. And good luck with keeping your domain knowledge up-to-date while developing and maintaining your vibecoded system. Assuming you can even provide enough details and deterministic specification to AI agent, because understanding business and having knowledge is not equal to being able to write down specific and concise rules to make a system out of it.

And if you think LLM are (or will be) good enough to not care about software part, what makes you think that your domain will not be completely resolved by AI?

This is why im using ramdisk for a browser cache.

So its true what they were saying about bitcoin. It is used by criminals.

You dont need to measure the code complexity, you can completely hallucinate those numbers if you feel that code is too complex and then watch how LLM will respond.

> if you feel that code is too complex

Now you're assuming a human is actually trying to understand the code. What a world we live in (sarcasm).

To be honest, you can feel code is too complex even without reading a single line of it.

I love how petty this feels. :))

But it would be also possible that sentinel value used for comparison changed because of bitflip, not data structure used by program.

Detecting that is the point, yes.

Waiting for THChat

I would be angry too. Its definitely not that micro.