Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pch00's commentslogin

> Time to start learning Mandarin

Mandarin has been on the curriculum at my son's school for the past few years. Prescient planning imho.


Absolutely hate numberpads on laptops - if you're sitting with the laptop directly in front of you it means your arms and hands are slightly offset to the left for normal typing.


Anthropic built the Torment Nexus - calling it now.


> The New Yorker prefers insure to ensure. They have a unique house style.

That's not a stylistic choice, it's just incorrect use of English.


Well that’s just, like, your opinion, man. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insure


That M-W entry literally says they're different words with different meanings:

> They are in fact different words, but with sufficient overlap in meaning and form as to create uncertainty as to which should be used when.

> We define ensure as “to make sure, certain, or safe” and one sense of insure, “to make certain especially by taking necessary measures and precautions,” is quite similar. But insure has the additional meaning “to provide or obtain insurance on or for,” which is not shared by ensure.


Definition 2: "to make certain especially by taking necessary measures and precautions"

From the article:

> He sent the final memos to the other board members as disappearing messages, to insure that no one else would ever see them.

> Others were uncomfortable sharing concerns about Altman because they felt there was not a sufficient effort to insure anonymity.

> [...] to insure that the technology was deployed safely

All of these work just fine with that definition of "insure." Your comment that it's "incorrect use of English" is wrong.

The bit you quoted says there’s substantial overlap between the two. The New Yorker style is to prefer “insure” in cases where either could work.


I'm unconvinced but I'll ensure I do my homework before grammar-policing again :)


To be fair, I use “ensure” myself, but it’s just one of several quirky elements of the New Yorker’s style, along with the diaeresis on repeated vowels with different sounds (like in reëmerge or coöperate), several uncommon spellings, and unusual conjoinings like “teen-ager” and “per cent.” It’s part of the charm, I suppose


Britain has the 8th-most expensive electricity in the world[1], seems prudent that a Brit would try to be more self-sufficient in terms of generation?

[1] https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/cost-of-e...


Ok.

On your map, let's say the source is valid, UK has $0.4. I'm from CZ, we have $0.35.

UK has more than double median salary, DOUBLE. Which means that in some cities it will be actually more like 2x or 3x smaller. But price of electricity is more or less same in the whole country here.

Don't tell me something about expensive electricity and saving money. Because on top of that, let's check affordable housing stats

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/affordabl...

Yep, one of the worst in EU, yaay.


> Anyone else into what my high school biology teacher loved referring to as "pseudo-arachnomorphic diagrams" (Mind Maps[1] / Spider Diagrams)?

Yes! Nearly all my notes are mind-map-ish. I’m a visual thinker/planner with ADHD and mind-map style “spatial notes” are the only ones that make sense to me when writing and reviewing later. I’ve tried a few methods of moving this process to digital over the years but nothing sticks like pen & paper.


Can't view the pricing page without logging in (/app/pricing immediately redirects to a login box). Not going to get invested in a product until I know how much it'll cost in the long term.


Came here to say the same thing, what a wonderful post.


I really don't want to be too much of a downer, but is this really just an HN post about someone putting something on a shelf?


You're not wrong.

How in gods name this article made it to the front page of HN is a mystery.


Because enough readers upvoted it to cause it to appear there.


Any ideas on that mystery, then? Since you’ve got your finger on the pulse around here.


There's no mystery. The way any story makes the front page is enough users upvote it from the "new" page for it to appear there.

So the answer to the question of "how did it make it there" is exactly what I said, enough upvoted it that it made it to the front page.

As to "why" those folks upvoted it, well, on that I have no idea.


No I already knew you have no idea, that’s no mystery.


16 points in 2 hours?


What can I say, I'm a Billy simp, there's one just behind me as I'm writing this comment and for about a year now I've been forcing myself to buy a new one to put it on the right-side of my current desk (sometimes I'm too lazy for my own good, as in this case). So just seeing Billy in the title and as the actual subject of the blog-post made me upvote the submission, apparently I'm not alone in this.


You <-----> The Point.


Literally today I was thinking about how to organize all my out of date computers in my room, and thinking about building a cabinet or shelves.

Oddly poignant. I can't be the only one.


Bots are in to stuff like this.


Hey at least it's not Yet Another Fucking LLM Article.


Well, you know how messy most hackers are..... my mom would like this article.


You could start a giant company using some computers on shelves: https://www.computerhistory.org/collections/catalog/10266216...


If the 486es were running OpenClaw then everyone would be losing their minds.


I mean, you can probably reduce any HN article to something that doesnt sound worthy of being on here if you want


Sure, but this truly is just about putting a motherboard on a shelf.

They couldn’t even be bothered to get a good photo of it ffs.


This article proactively saves you the time and effort to reduce. It is really just that. Man realizes his object fits on shelf.


> I don't agree about containers, they are a really handy tool to produce stable(-ish) deployments.

Agreed - at least so long as we're living with the current OS paradigms that have been around since the 70s. Redhat: bring us something modern that handles software distribution/dependencies/lifecycle management/partitioning/security boundaries in a nicer way and maybe we won't need containers.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: