Why is it so hard for many people to accept, that this is a solution for a specific problem of shopify? They did not say that Redis is bad and MySql is good. They only a solve their problem.

Even the good teams may make bad choices, that's why it is interesting to read their ideas and discuss them

Cool idea, but please make it better!

https://geajs.com/ done.

if you don't like this.

  .button {
      @apply py-2 px-4 bg-indigo-500 text-white font-semibold rounded-lg hover:bg-indigo-700 focus:bg-indigo-700;
  }

why not write it like this?

  .button {
    @apply
      py-2
      px-4
      bg-indigo-500
      text-white
      font-semibold
      rounded-lg
      hover:bg-indigo-700
      focus:bg-indigo-700
    ;
  }

Or:

  .button {
    padding: var(--gap-s) var(--gap-m);
    background-color: var(--color-indigo);
    color: var(--color-white);
    font-weight: 700;
    border-radius: var(--gap-s);
    &:hover, &:focus {
        background-color: var(--color-indigo-hover);
    }
  }

Fair comparison (i really don't like this too):

  .button { padding: var(--gap-s) var(--gap-m); background-color: var(--color-indigo); color: var(--color-white); font-weight: 700; border-radius: var(--gap-s);    &:hover, &:focus { background-color: var(--color-indigo-hover); } }

;-)

"Nothing stops you from using sky-400 and blue-400 in the same project. Consistency still depends on your discipline, not on the framework."

And how did plain css solve that? You're mixing up a few issues there.

I've had the same experience. Tried it and use in 2 hours more token than in a whole week. Normally i got 80 - 90 % cache hit rate.

And how much token and time you use to solve a problem? The price alone doesn't mean anything.

Example DeepSeek-V4-Pro (high) needs 10 times more token then GPT 5.5 (medium) and can compete only with the price.

The real price saver are the cache prices, the ting, that nearly nobody has on their radar.

Ockbench: https://ockbench.github.io/ show token usage and accuracy, but you have to compare it with other stats (prices and speed).

"Open won"... to be fair cause "google paid it".

I think the fact that Mozilla survival model ultimately depends on Google's money means Google is keeping a corpse propped up just to have a defense argument that a browser competitor still exists, so they don't get hit with monopoly regulations.

Particularly in this day in age when the FF market share is down to low single digits

No lol if you read why: https://github.com/xai-org/grok-build/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING...

That's a reason to disable pull requests. They can still accept issues and discussions from the public.

Costs?