> It wouldn't stop people from feeding them into the Show HN stream, which is the problem. If we had a good enough way to tell them apart, we could factor them into two streams, but we don't yet.

But it would allow for a culture to grow where the posters would self-contain their submissions into those threads.

> Do you really believe that year after year game developers and game engines get worse and worse at performance? Of course not.

If you strictly want to blame Denuvo then that assumes game developers cannot think of a way to spend their extra performance either. Which is obviously not the case.

It is the average of sub sets of humans, which can be vastly better than just entire population.

Example it can easily do moderately advanced calculus, that is way better than the average human.

This is even the official OpenAI guideline too.

We also have had a significant rise inglobal population. Making for an unfair comparison.

> It's an entirely new class of vulnerability, as far as I can tell.

It is know as voltage glitching. If you're interested our research group applies to Intel CPUs. https://download.vusec.net/papers/microspark_uasc26.pdf

What is the point of having this if code generation is not functional yet? That is the entire point of this app.

To show off an AI generated website

TUIs are very in right now. Nostalgia/vintage-computin-aesthetics & guru-gatekeeping around command line savviness are front and centre in the HN-and-adjacent mindshare.

I think it's AI tools, they are often done as tuis, they work well with text, the cli is a text processing god that is easy to extend with cli utilities, and since you find yourself in the terminal much nicer having TUIs quickly available, editor, git client, etc. I love the shift to the terminal as I use it a lot anyways (I'm old), but the missing piece for me is having a good sql tui client that does at least some of what data grip does. So I'm building my own as an experiment into agentic coding something from scratch (which I think what this TUI Studio is also). Surprised how good it is but also surprised how much time it takes to get things polished.

It's strange. For decades we've been trying to move towards GUIs, now we're moving backwards.

Without providing any proof that either this or SELinux is backdoored.

> No, we get applications so hideously inefficient that your $3000 developer machine feels like it it's running a Pentium II with 256 MB of RAM.

> We get software that's as slow as it was 30 years ago, for no reason other than our own arrogance and apathy.

I feel like I read this exact same take on this site for the past 15 years.

I think the error was to say "as fast"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36446933

Because it's been true for the past 15 years.

The problem is that we already can provide an alternative, but we don't switch to them. Which might be even worse.