Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | wnc3141's commentslogin

The brooklinen ads are mortifying when I'm online in public

Use an adblocker?

That's what I do and why I don't even know what brooklinen is.


The web is becoming very hostile to ad blockers. I use a VPN and I've noticed more and more sites just being obnoxious with their popups and even just crashing the site completely in a loop (looking at you EuroNews)

It doesn't solve everything but the 'full' desktop version of the ublock origin plugin runs just fine in Android on Firefox. I can't even imagine using any other mobile browser now. I don't know what the situation is for iphone platform stuff these days.

and f.e. brave on ios

If a site doesn’t let me see it with my ad blocking enabled, I just go elsewhere.

This Even skimming the web could take up 1000X the hours I have in a day, and I really should spend more time exercising, and reading books, and with friends and family, and volunteering, and ...

Try firefox, as chrome puts restrictions on what adblockers can do

I suspect it's not a real crash you're seeing, but rather a deceptive anti-adblocking script that redirects to a page that fraudulently claims to be a crash.

They sell bedsheets, with sort of a raunchy ad campaign. I had a adblocker but wound up uninstalling it when it became more of a hassle than it was worth.

abp in firefox doesn't really remove them. I've seen and reported multiple scummy popup-like looking ads like tfn and saw it again for weeks...

There may be gaps every now and then in block lists of ad blocking solutions, but besides that, you are using the wrong ad blocker. abp is not to be trusted to reliably block all ads it could. It has a different mission than uBlock Origin.

Use ublock origin rather than ABP. ABP was dead the moment they sold out to "responsible" ads.

ABP as in adblock plus?

Don't use that. Use Ublock Origin.


its mostly because the global economy is dollarized so there's a number of benefits store your wealth in dollars as a hedge or point of stability. If the dollar's dominance wanes, so too will be the appetite for US treasuries.

Meta saw the grave premonitions from ai firms as a means of edging out legacy firms through regulatory capture.


Meta is by far the worst at doing regulatory capture of the big companies: they're the one big tech company it's OK to hate and want to die even if you're a politician.

Not saying they're not trying.


I saw a report recently that they are behind 80% of the lobbying for age gate laws in the US. Obviously for their benefit.


Social media bans are obviously not to Meta's benefit. Meta has to spend a ton of lobbying money on at least avoiding them being held responsible for kids circumventing them (which, let's be real, they inevitably will).

The only reason they might succeed is that the surveillance industry would love to put it on edge devices instead.

I don't think this undermines what I wrote.


tell me more? I used to live in Albuquerque and always wondered what happened.


On general magic and their 90s smartphone efforts and the constraints they worked within.


Own a significant chunk of a rapidly growing large company, or be LeBron james.


Stalin's demographic researchers kept disappearing until they came up with the numbers he wanted.


The only thing that doesn't make sense: these companies are more profitable than ever. Google stock rocketed up last year. AI spend per employee is also up, many companies with a strictly enforced minimum AI spend. Surely that cost could have gone to entry levels?


A family member at a large tech has stated that their has been an effective hiring freeze for the last three-ish years in their department. To the point that they're letting major business lines rot on the vine.


There are extractive and inclusive economic institutions. democracies tend to guarantee the latter, we are rapidly pursuing the former.


I don’t know about that, I feel like one of the issues when one person-one vote democracies is that it means the greater population demographic (aka the Boomers) hold a relatively higher proportion of the vote and thus can majority rule everyone else.


The mistake you're making here is in the assumption that voters have any meaningful input on policy. Given the overwhelming majority of policy at both the state and federal level is drafted by lobbyists this assumption seems questionable at best.


I think the designation of the US as a flawed democracy is fair. We have free elections, yet (particularly at higher levels of government) rarely see popular mandates translate to governance.


But that's a feature of oligarchies more than it is of democracies.


Evidence suggests the US has been a de facto oligarchy since at least 2014:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-poli...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: