microsoft.com/devbox

Nor f.lux, the warm light software that got Sherlocked by every major OS.

https://justgetflux.com/

Nor the Flux Capacitor from Back to the Future.

Nor the famed Good Will Hunting and Argo actor and director, Ben Afflux

Nor the Cartoon Network show (and later movie) Aeon Flux.

I think it originally aired on MTV.

Nor the streaming service Net Flux

Nor the continuous delivery K8s tool. https://fluxcd.io/

Man that’s a blast from the past; used to be one of my fav apps.

Sure, corporations would _never_ get into the real estate market...

Could I use Cloudflare's free nameservers instead of Amazon Lightsail?

Cloudflare only supports managing top level domains on the Free plan.

Running Android, not Gentoo.

Not quite Android: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48112299

They weren't feeling "book.google"?

They bought that TLD and then never did anthing fun with it. I can forgive them for not doing https://google, since that's discouraged apparently, but not even fonts.google? docs.google? mail.google? Apparently once upon a time you could do com.google for an April Fools prank but they didn't even keep a basic redirect. The only thing they ever permanently used it for (afaik) was domains.google, and they sold that to Squarespace. Why even spend the money?

They have several.

https://blog.google

https://ai.google

https://about.google

https://environment.google

https://safety.google

and a few others

the pattern seems to be that all of these don't use your google account, i suppose their system (through cookies or something similar) depends on the domain google.com somehow.

I do this occasionally, but am fine with using Bambu's integrated Slicer and Remote Control software. It works well enough.

Official cybersecurity insurance company required FAQ:

https://www.instructure.com/incident_update

The way they describe it as an issue with free accounts seems vague and misleading. Why would _any_ account have this broad of access? Why would free ones be uniquely insecure vs official ones?

This suggests a bad actor at any institution could do the same thing done here. No?

I haven't seen a theme on OSM data look this modern and fresh before. Beautiful color palette and iconography!

It looks like Mapbox Standard [1]. While a free tier is available, most sites are going to need a paid plan.

[1] https://docs.mapbox.com/map-styles/standard/guides/

Can you try this one ? Though not as flashy, it's a step away from most OSM styles.

https://cartes.app/#13.13/47.06727/15.44801

Very pretty! Muted palette in light mode, but nice dark mode too!

Yes, and it's programmatic.

We're also re-coding an OSM-colored style in this same typescript base.

I, for one, do like it. I usually prefer lighter themes, but this one would be more than ok for me.

Cool ! It's fully open source. Quite a complex TS style https://codeberg.org/cartes/web/src/branch/master/app/styles...

And its Tilemaker profile to generate the tiles : https://codeberg.org/cartes/serveur/src/branch/master/tilema...

It's a Mapbox theme

Agreed - it is very similar to Google Maps.

> ...cancel about $430 billion in debt principal and affect nearly all borrowers...

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-506_nmip.pdf