It's not written as a "statement [of fact]", that is incorrect. How did 'beervir... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

TameAntelope on Feb 11, 2021 | parent | context | favorite | on: Evidence that the FBI can hack into private Signal...

It's not written as a "statement [of fact]", that is incorrect.

How did 'beervirus and I know how to interpret the phrase successfully?

torwayburger on Feb 24, 2021 [–]

You're interpretation of it isn't wrong. You're still wrong in asserting that it wasn't presentes as a fact in the article. It clearly, linguistically is.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact