Surely in this case, the second report must have added some details, since they weren't fixing the original report and i assume android doesn't just sit on lock bypasses.
Seems to me that if you report something that significantly recontextualizes a previous report (e.g. make it go from a low to a high severity), then your report shouldn't be considered a dupe.
Seems to me that if you report something that significantly recontextualizes a previous report (e.g. make it go from a low to a high severity), then your report shouldn't be considered a dupe.