I can't agree that a buggy and slow version of a product is an MVP. There are a ...

serbrech on March 18, 2012 | parent | context | favorite | on: Why software sucks?

I can't agree that a buggy and slow version of a product is an MVP. There are a lot of things that you can cut from a product to make it minimal. I don't believe quality is one of them. However, I also believe that user feedback cannot be the only factor to build something truly great.

gaius on March 18, 2012 [–]

Windows 1.0 and Word 1.0 were viable by definition, as people did buy them.