Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In the Madoff case his company was put under receivership, not seized: http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-293-order.pdf And ownership wasn't transfered of anything: he was enjoyed from transferring or disposing of value.


The seizures are analogous.

Per the document linked to Madoff's estate was put under an "order freezing assets" [1]. Dotcom's property is described as being "seized and restrained" [2], not confiscated or forfeited.

[1] http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-293-order.pdf

[2] http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: