There is no evidence in this article that 1) this approach is better than A/B te... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

eta_carinae on May 29, 2012 | parent | context | favorite | on: 20 lines of code that beat A/B testing every time

There is no evidence in this article that

1) this approach is better than A/B testing. 2) it doesn't suffer from the the Heisenberg principle

Also, the call out box at the top is obviously an ad but it's not marked "Sponsored link", which is really scammy.

sarchertech on May 29, 2012 [–]

>Also, the call out box at the top is obviously an ad but it's not marked "Sponsored link", which is really scammy.

That's because it's a link to a webapp the author built.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact