In 2007 Microsoft was on top of the console market, which was also a pretty new market for Microsoft in general. It doesn't factor into their argument much.
In any case, the article is definitely hyperbolic. The overall statement that Microsoft is no longer an IBM-tier titanic bully is correct, "dead" is an aggressive overstatement.
In any case, the article is definitely hyperbolic. The overall statement that Microsoft is no longer an IBM-tier titanic bully is correct, "dead" is an aggressive overstatement.