Doesn’t really connect the dots. For example suggest the Gothic disappers beween Victorianism and The Doors, completely missing the horror movies which was a major influence on the aesthetic.
I didn’t suggest that the Gothic disappeared between the Victorians and The Doors:
While the Gothic didn’t disappear entirely after the Victorian Era, it was largely pushed aside by Modernism and related movements for most of the early 20th century.
It was only by the 1960s that the Gothic ideal began to make a resurgence – this time via music.
This is pretty standard history. Modernism dominated most art forms at the time.
But yes, films were an influence as well. I couldn’t include every influence on the genre as the post would be novel length. The ending part is a bit condensed as a result as I wasn’t trying to explain the intricacies of modern goth culture, just show how the word traveled through time. It’s been awhile since I wrote the post but IIRC the films didn’t play a direct role in transferring the use of the word gothic itself, as they were primarily referred to as horror films.
> This is pretty standard history. Modernism dominated most art forms at the time.
Not sure what “standard history” you are relying on, but gothic horror was a major influence on movies (and other popular media like comics). Modernism is a somewat nebolous term, but German expressionism seem to be generally categorized as modernism, even when the movies are clearly gothic horror (eg Nosferatu is heavily based on Dracula, they just couldn’t secure the rights to the novel, so changed the name).
Sure, modernism could include German Expressionism, but I had in mind Art Deco, Bauhaus and Modernist architecture, along with visual art movements like Dada, De Stiji, Cubism, etc. - the things that are typically referred to by the word modernist. The qualities these things have in common tend to be distinctly different from the qualities that the Gothic has usually had.
According to historian Roger Griffin, modernism can be defined as a broad cultural, social, or political initiative sustained by the ethos of "the temporality of the new". Griffin believed that modernism aspired to restore a "sense of sublime order and purpose to the contemporary world, thereby counteracting the (perceived) erosion of an overarching 'nomos', or 'sacred canopy', under the fragmenting and secularizing impact of modernity".
This focus on the new and future is definitely not something Gothic does, which is traditionally very focused on the past.
In architecture, for example, the Gothic lost most of its influence:
New architectural movements, sometimes related, as in the Arts and Crafts movement, and sometimes in outright opposition, such as Modernism, gained ground, and by the 1930s the architecture of the Victorian era was generally condemned or ignored.
And again, the purpose of the article was to trace the term gothic through history, not to explain the influence of the Gothic in toto. These films may have been influential, but they were based on already written Gothic works, and they weren't dominant in the way Gothic architecture or literature were in the Victorian era. Gothic in the 20th century was more of an influence on other art movements (including German Expressionism), not a fully-fledged art movement itself, as it had been in the past.
Overall I agree that a line about the films would have been good to add, but I don't think it was necessarily essential to tracing the word gothic through time. The term was applied to music because of the location "in the gloomy vaulted wine cellar of the Delmonico hotel, not because of a reference to the films.
I'm not sure why this single point "doesn’t really connect the dots" for you, considering that the rest of the post covers dozens of other significant influences over two millenia.
My point is just that “goth” is heavily inspired by horror movies.
Saying the genre was “largely pushed aside” is absurd. Everyone knows how Frankensteins monster looks. How many cultural expression have this kind of impact?
If you are relying on books which does not recognize the impact of horror movies on popular culture, you should find better books.
