> he wasn’t being philosophical. He was describing the exact contradiction that made his own job impossible.
Is this written by AI? It has the typical "That's not X. That's Y." phrasing. A bit ironic given the content.
Excellent candidate for throwing into AI and asking for a summary; if you bother reading it at all.
reply
Would an author come here on hacker news and just post rage-baiting AI slop? For sure not!
> he wasn’t being philosophical. He was describing the exact contradiction that made his own job impossible.
Is this written by AI? It has the typical "That's not X. That's Y." phrasing. A bit ironic given the content.