Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

With kdbus (dbus in the kernel) on its way it is largely moot anyway.

"Disconnecting from dbus" at that point will not be very meaningful.



Moot? Putting dbus in the kernel is demented. Creating a hard dependency between it and a monolithic set of interdependent systemd code is even more demented.

It's like the Linux folks looked at Mac OS X and learned nothing.

Hint: Mac OS X handles more that systemd does, and still does it in a way that maintains separation of concerns between service management, configuration management, logging, and IPC.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: