> "The fish oil capsules I don't think will stand up to a critical review. They simply don't do anything for you," he said. "The people should know that it doesn't help to prevent heart disease."
This struck me. For example examine.com has[0] quite good coverage when it comes to supplements like fish oil, and not surprisingly their round-up shows multitude of benefits from fish oil.
Okay, perhaps the phrasing was altered to provoke and mislead the reader, but still.
You might want to look at the examine.com page more carefully. The only result that is both significant (i.e. large effect) and robust (i.e. agreement in lots of double blind studies) is a reduction of triglycerides. And that is an indirect impact on health outcomes at best. The rest of the studies were either for sub-groups (depressed people) or were insignificant, mixed direction and/or not robust.
I've been downvoted into oblivion in this thread, so the forum system might hide this post from you. But, I was just going to chime in that I agree with you.
Also, I think more people need to look at what the prestigious Mayo clinic has to say about the positive benefits of fish oil as well:
N-3 fatty acids interfere with oxidative metabolism and promote cancer. In the short term N-3 oils can appear to help various problems like inflammation because they suppress the immune system. In the long term that's obviously bad.
This struck me. For example examine.com has[0] quite good coverage when it comes to supplements like fish oil, and not surprisingly their round-up shows multitude of benefits from fish oil.
Okay, perhaps the phrasing was altered to provoke and mislead the reader, but still.
0: http://examine.com/supplements/Fish+Oil/