If one talks about why Go is fast, and then compares techniques against other languages ANYWAYS, what the heck is the reader supposed to think?
That a short discussion of language feature implementation techniques is provided as a point of comparison with regards to different types of overheads?
In an academic paper, this would be torpedoed right away
Well, since I read "this" in the context of this sentence as an assertion imagined by you and unsupported by facts, then yes, you are obviously right. That would be torpedoed. Note that it's not a product of who you thought it was.
That a short discussion of language feature implementation techniques is provided as a point of comparison with regards to different types of overheads?
In an academic paper, this would be torpedoed right away
Well, since I read "this" in the context of this sentence as an assertion imagined by you and unsupported by facts, then yes, you are obviously right. That would be torpedoed. Note that it's not a product of who you thought it was.