Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Maybe Netscape's duct-tape programming had some side-effects though... http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html


If you read the chapter that Joel recommends, it talks about the design patterns guys that came in and how the anti-duct tape guys had a role to play in that delay.


I haven't read the book yet, plan to get it soon. Sounds awesome.


A consequence of those rewrite side-effects:

Mozilla Firefox was forked from the rewritten Mozilla codebase

> Netscape 6.0 is finally going into its first public beta...Well, yes. They did. They did it by making the single worst strategic mistake that any software company can make: They decided to rewrite the code from scratch.

http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/releases/0.1.html

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-users@linux-sxs.org/msg067...


You're confusing two different things here.

Re-writing a codebase to spawn a totally seperate application is not the same as when you're doing it to re-release an enhanced version of the same application (with a bumped up version number).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: